Programming Forums
User Name Password Register
 

RSS Feed
FORUM INDEX | TODAY'S POSTS | UNANSWERED THREADS | ADVANCED SEARCH

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 29th, 2006, 8:47 AM   #11
Lich
Professional Programmer
 
Lich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 254
Rep Power: 4 Lich is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Lich Send a message via MSN to Lich
take your DVD to a video game store or something and have them buff out the scratches and sand down the disc, that should help. Then if the DVD is older, DVD shrink should be able to handle it no problem. If not, try DVD Decryptor, which I've had good success with. You'll need to run the large ISO throuhDVD shrink when you're done copying it, but then you'll have a good, working backup.
__________________
--John Cruz
Web Developer
www.cruzweb.net
Lich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29th, 2006, 6:52 PM   #12
lectricpharaoh
Caffeinated Neural Net
 
lectricpharaoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dry west coast of Canada
Posts: 1,010
Rep Power: 5 lectricpharaoh will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by nnxion
Of course you can reverse engineer the method, and then by using lowlevel I/O copying the bad sectors, and making them unidentical.
Nono, that's not what I meant. Imagine sector X is bad. If you read it, it gives a certain result. But, because it's bad, if you read it again, you're likely to get a different result. Read this sector several times, and if you get the same result each time, it's a properly-formatted sector (and thus exists on a copied disk). Using low-level I/O won't get around it. Low-level I/O might help with the other stunts they used to make the disk difficult to copy (such as different tracks having varying numbers of sectors), but it won't help with the bad sector trick.
__________________
And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper-piece harlot.
- Vaarsuvius, Order of the Stick
lectricpharaoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29th, 2006, 7:05 PM   #13
nnxion
Programming Guru
 
nnxion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: elemental plane
Posts: 1,429
Rep Power: 5 nnxion is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lectricpharaoh
Nono, that's not what I meant. Imagine sector X is bad. If you read it, it gives a certain result. But, because it's bad, if you read it again, you're likely to get a different result. Read this sector several times, and if you get the same result each time, it's a properly-formatted sector (and thus exists on a copied disk). Using low-level I/O won't get around it. Low-level I/O might help with the other stunts they used to make the disk difficult to copy (such as different tracks having varying numbers of sectors), but it won't help with the bad sector trick.
Thank you for the insight. How about creating your own diskreader which is able to scratch the disk with its header, so instead of formatting it writes bad sectors. (I'm not sure if that's even possible.)
__________________
"Employ your time in improving yourself by other men's writings, so that you shall gain easily what others have labored hard for."
-- Socrates
nnxion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30th, 2006, 11:24 PM   #14
lectricpharaoh
Caffeinated Neural Net
 
lectricpharaoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dry west coast of Canada
Posts: 1,010
Rep Power: 5 lectricpharaoh will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by nnxion
Thank you for the insight. How about creating your own diskreader which is able to scratch the disk with its header, so instead of formatting it writes bad sectors. (I'm not sure if that's even possible.)
Dunno about that. When I say 'bad sectors', I don't mean physically damaged (though they might be). I just mean ones that are not formatted. Those little magnetic domains that indicate ones and zeroes are not aligned in a manner so as to clearly and consistently read as one or the other. Since many floppies come 'preformatted', and have for years, it would seem to be difficult to acquire a truly unformatted one. It might be possible to ruin it with a magnet, degauss it, or something, and then do a low-level format/copy operation to affect only those areas of the disk which were to be 'good sectors', but I'm not certain. I expect that the companies that used techniques like this had hardware that's not available to your average computer nerd.

Nowadays, it's a non-issue, with nobody using floppies for commercial software distribution. They're basically relegated to the role of emergency boot disks and sneakernet file transfer for people too cheap to pick up a USB keydrive, or in situations where such devices aren't supported. Today, copy protection methods tend to revolve around encryption of data, and detecting physical differences between factory (pressed) and copied (burned) optical disks.
__________________
And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper-piece harlot.
- Vaarsuvius, Order of the Stick
lectricpharaoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2006, 7:13 AM   #15
DaWei
Resident Grouch
 
DaWei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 10 DaWei is on a distinguished road
The purpose of formatting isn't to organize the randomized domains, which is fairly irrelevant. It's to lay down a framework defining the organization of the disk (sectors, etc.) In the earliest days one could get diskettes which were "hard-formatted", which is to say they had holes around the periphery that were detected by photosensors. In hard drives (magnetic) and CDs the head doesn't contact the medium. Physical scratching is out -- you'd scratch the whole dam' drive. As lectric says, you can do much if you merely go low level; the format and the protocols are merely guidelines for transportability.
__________________
Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code.
Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers
DaWei is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread in Forum | Next Thread in Forum »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




DaniWeb IT Discussion Community
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 DaniWeb® LLC