![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Resident Grouch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 10
![]() |
Chill, yourself, buster. All I saw was two posts in a row on a months old thread. That is often indicative of spamming. If it was a result of merging two threads, okay, but that doesn't mean I don't or can't wonder about such things, and take an attitude toward them. I call your 40 years and raise.
__________________
Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() |
"I call your 40 years and raise."
I fold. ![]()
__________________
http://jasonpowers.net "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Resident Grouch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 10
![]() |
ROFL! Really, there was no need for further comment. My post wasn't rude, it was questioning, and it was obviously made before Kyle explained the merge. The rationale behind the question is also quite obvious to those who have been around awhile. Spammers quite often dig up old threads and reply with posts which have beneficial links in the signature. This even was mentioned in the rules, at one time. I realize that informative posts can be made at a late date, but we HAVE discussed the desirability of automatically questioning a poster who has dredged up a thread a few months old.
__________________
Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|