![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Professional Programmer
|
I haven't seen someone cause this much trouble so quickly on a forum in such a short time in a while. It's like watching a bad soap opera here. I've kept my mouth shut for the most part because most of my life is spend arguing points, and in this case I don't need to say anything, it's already out on the table.
Bryan, you have a fucking hell of a lot to learn, and i'm not simply talking web development here. End of story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Programmer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
wow, I go to work and all hell breaks loose! I've just begun using div tags and css, and it's pretty sweet what you can do with them. I've gotten pretty good at editing css and php, but I haven't written very much of it myself. Thanks DaWei and iignotus. I do prefer css, because as far as I can see it saves you a lot of time. I've been trying to make my code more efficient. Lately I have been using the php <include> tag a lot, and it's very handy. It's amazing how one line of code can simplify your entire site. Before I used the <include> tag I went to each html page and edited the header code to change the links at the top of the page. Now all I do is change my header.php file and the whole site changes! I can see why the <center> tag is old news now. I don't mind recoding my site, in fact that's what I'm doing. In the long run it will make it easier to add to and make my site more efficient. Plus I learn in the process. Thanks again.
__________________
"I have many layer-eight problems in my life, including myself." |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
Humm... I was kinda hopeing you would come back and end this thread. No make more questions.
So you are or are not going to use the tamplate I created? The sooner you answer the sooner we can bring this to a end. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Programmer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
I was trying to put it nicely bja888, but I didn't like your solution, and you are an idiot. If I read your template correctly, it would only work on certain resolutions. It only pushed my footer down a certain number of pixels. I can do that with <br> tags. CSS is so much more efficient, and I don't see why you keep replying pointlessly to this thread.
__________________
"I have many layer-eight problems in my life, including myself." |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Programmer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
argh, I used DaWei's example code to redo my downloads page. It looks awesome in firefox, but it's looks totally screwed up in IE. The css code iignotus gave me doesn't even work. I don't use IE but a lot of people do. Is this code not globally browser friendly or did I not use the code correctly?
__________________
"I have many layer-eight problems in my life, including myself." |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
Maybe you can paste what you have and we can try and make suggestions.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Resident Grouch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 10
![]() |
Are you saying my simple example didn't work in IE? It works perfectly, here (screenshot attached). If you are doing a number of more complex things, you always have to take into consideration the poor performance of IE, in terms of W3C DOM compliance. One important thing to do is to make sure your DOCTYPE specification is correct. IE will perform differently depending upon whether no DOCTYPE is specified, it's using "quirks" mode, or it asked to be as strictly compliant as possible. Sometimes IE does better with stringent requirements, and sometimes it does better with more relaxed requirements. That's what makes it a pain-in-the-butt. In my last three applications I only had to browser-sniff for one thing, and that was a very uncommon situation involving a div's "table-type" attributes in conjunction with display mode. I was, in fact making rows in a shopping cart disappear and reappear according to use and mode (cart/catalog). IE doesn't always interpret the container hierarchy correctly, in terms of what is parent and what is child. It can truly be a pain in the butt. One has to either dig out all the relevant facts, avoid some particular requirement, or put IE in a garbage disposal and giggle insanely as it goes sewer-bound.
__________________
Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Professional Programmer
|
Quote:
!! It works fine for me. Put your entire website (those two pages and the css style sheet) up here as [ code ] and I'll try to see what's wrong.
__________________
% rc4 hexkey < input > output
#define S ,t=s[i],s[i]=s[j],s[j]=t /* rc4 hexkey <file */
unsigned char k[256],s[256],i,j,t;main(c,v,e)char**v;{++v;while(++i)s[
i]=i;for(c=0;*(*v)++;k[c++]=e)sscanf((*v)++-1,"%2x",&e);while(j+=s[i]
+k[i%c]S,++i);for(j=0;c=~getchar();putchar(~c^s[t+=s[i]]))j+=s[++i]S;} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Professional Programmer
|
Quote:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | ||
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
Quote:
CSS is efficient, but it would be easier not to use it in this case. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|