![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
I see what you're saying now by the redundant storage, and understand how that could be a problem. However, I doubt there's much I'd be able to do about that without taking more time than it would to just dump the dang thing. Or are these regulations reasonably easy (and universal) to simulate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Resident Grouch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 10
![]() |
I don't think you'd find it trivial. At the same time, I don't want to discourage you from doing what you can. Modern OSs are fairly successful. I think a lot of people aren't aware that disk operations are orders of magnitude slower than memory operations because of that success. Forcing a dump of the whole thing, if it didn't clear the cache, would be a write-through op and not necessarily incur the time expense of forcing a dump AND clearing cache.
Dang it, you're going to mess around and pique my interest and make me look at things that I haven't bothered with for years. Bad Sane, bad Sane.
__________________
Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hacking the Python compiler | Arevos | Python | 5 | Jan 28th, 2006 4:24 AM |
| [tutorial] Python for programming beginners | coldDeath | Python | 30 | Dec 14th, 2005 11:35 AM |
| Advanced Python Tricks | Arevos | Python | 19 | Sep 24th, 2005 7:39 AM |
| Python - A Programmers Introduction | coldDeath | Python | 17 | Aug 19th, 2005 12:41 PM |
| Pointers in C (Part I) | Stack Overflow | C | 4 | Apr 28th, 2005 7:03 PM |