|
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
Jun 13th, 2006, 1:07 PM
|
#1 |
|
Programmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
 |
do you prefer high level or low level?
and, who do you think deserves the most credit? The guy writing protocols, or the analyst who designs how it should work using uml?
__________________
It's not complex if you know what you're doing... |
|
|
|
Jun 13th, 2006, 1:08 PM
|
#2 |
|
Programming Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,499
Rep Power: 5
|
The person who does both. It's very much possible to program at a high level with the right tools and languages.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 13th, 2006, 1:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Programmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
|
High level (to me) tasks are still considered programming; its just that you're concerned with a significantly less amount of detail. You ever seen that movie Minority Report? Remember how he was operating the police stations computer? That reminded me of uml; all visual, all concept.
__________________
It's not complex if you know what you're doing... |
|
|
|
|
Jun 13th, 2006, 1:45 PM
|
#4 |
|
Programming Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3,473
Rep Power: 8
  |
both. the guy that deserves the most credit is the one you never hear of.
__________________
http://jasonpowers.net "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
