|
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jun 14th, 2006, 7:14 PM
|
#21 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 0
 |
I have used both of them... code::blocks has way to much stuff cluttered in there. Dev-C++ is plain and works fine for me...
|
|
|
|
Jun 14th, 2006, 7:20 PM
|
#22 | |
|
Professional Programmer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 495
Rep Power: 0
 |
What's so cluttered about code::blocks? Explain your statements.
__________________
▄▄▄▄ Quote:
Due to incorrect calculations during the middle ages, our calendar actually begins a few years after Jesus' birth. Thus the real 6/6/6 happened a few years back. The world already ended and you missed it. Download Code::Blocks now! ▄▄▄▄ |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14th, 2006, 7:22 PM
|
#23 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 0
|
Sorry I said that wrong, code::blocks is the same thing as Dev-C++ pretty much. They both do the same job, code::blocks just looks prettier and is updated more...
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16th, 2006, 11:26 AM
|
#24 |
|
I eat cake for breakfast.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In my box.
Posts: 4,434
Rep Power: 9
|
Code::Blocks was based on Dev-C++. It was created by a guy that used to be the lead programmer on the Dev-C++ team. Of course it's similar. But as people have said, it's not the same.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
