![]() |
?Best assembler to start with
What assembler I should start with?
TASM || MASM32 ? I worked a little with TASM, but I see that many bigger projects use MASM32. I don't want to learn 32 bit assembly and make .exes without experience in good ol' .com . 32-bit assembly is much more complicated... has include files... ... requires some knowledge of 16-bit assembly. ... and one question: Can I make 16-bit assembly programs with MASM? |
If you really want to write 16 Bits .com, you should give a try to A86.
Nevertheless, your opinion about what is "more complicated" is, exactely, the reverse of the real facts (Win32 Asm is _WAY_ easier than Dos Programming). You should really try NASM, FASM or RosAsm (TASM is dead since ages, and MASM is the worst possible choice). Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |
NASM from sourceforge. Free and opensource, and has an online community.
|
NASM seconded. It's the best.
|
As usual, I recommend MASM32. There is a huge user base along with a plethora of examples.
|
i personally like AT&T assembler more..
EDIT: w00t, 250 posts :) |
lostcauz,
just one question... i saw that MASM32 has IF, While and those things... Is MASM32 HLA? |
MASM and HLA are not the same. The constructs you mention are in MASM for easing the transition from a hll to asm. You may use them or ignore them.
If you are unsure about which assembler to try why not download a few and try them for a short time and see which one seems more fitting? MASM, FASM and NASM might be a good start. I'm not familiar with Betov's product. |
And don't forget AS :), it's included with GCC.
|
Okay, I'll try them...
I currently have TASM 5. It's very old, but i like it. It's maybe most easy assembler. MASM32 attracts me becouse it is most powerfull and has big community. Look at this : http://www.hostileencounter.com/ Whole RTS written in MASM. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007 DaniWeb® LLC