Programming Forums > Application Development > C++

DaWei · Apr 7th, 2006, 6:29 AM

An altogether excellent response. Tenacity and commitment worth a zillion bucks to the OP, The Dark.

The Dark · Apr 7th, 2006, 7:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nnxion

If you decide to rewrite it one day, then please do make a thread and show us the code, I would be interested in how you would have done it. Or would you have done it the same as this guy (cwl157)? (When not using arrays, that is.)

I was originally thinking that I would keep a "last" pointer and have a couple of functions to find the next and previous from that, but I am not entirely sure how well it would have worked. The array method seems a lot clearer, to me at least.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWei

An altogether excellent response. Tenacity and commitment worth a zillion bucks to the OP, The Dark.

Thanks, Dawei, cheers.

cwl157 · Apr 7th, 2006, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Tenacity and commitment worth a zillion bucks to the OP, The Dark.

Tenacity and commitment are all you need to writing a program if you work at it long enough eventually you will get it. Thats what i have learned...

Apr 7th, 2006, 6:29 AM	#21
DaWei Resident Grouch Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 6,453 Rep Power: 10	An altogether excellent response. Tenacity and commitment worth a zillion bucks to the OP, The Dark. __________________ Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Programming Forums > Application Development > C++

new thread for min heap