View Single Post
Old Feb 21st, 2006, 2:01 AM   #28
Ęthereal Haze
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: -=()N-=()=-C()=-
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 Ęthereal Haze is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Ęthereal Haze Send a message via MSN to Ęthereal Haze Send a message via Yahoo to Ęthereal Haze
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkhack
Don't worry about it. Quite honestly, I find it better that beginners never hear the words "goto" in their entire programming life. Unless your name is Linus Torvalds, Richard Stallman, Dennis Richie, or Bjarne Stroustrup, you have no use messing with goto statements. Some people say you should NEVER use them, but their are times when it is acceptable to use them for the sake of performance. Unless you are developing an operating system kernel, a compiler, or advanced robotics/AI software, then I would recommend you pretend as if they never existed. And when I say "for the sake of performance" I don't mean using them instead of loops; I mean using them along side in a very, very scarce manner. There are probebly less than 100 programmers on the face of the planet whom I would trust with using goto statements. Also, while on the topic, for the sake of arguement, you could, in theory, use goto statements in such a way that they would mimic regular loops. Although that would be about as pointless as running a lawn mower through a parking lot.
Hmmm............................... Yes, I See... I Do Very Well See Your Point........ I May Be A Newby To Forums, And May Not Understand What Is Going On Completely, ()---This Was Stated By Someone Earlier, So I Will Go Along With It, lol.....---() But I Sure Know That the Goto Command Can Be Quite Efficient. It All Depends On WHat You Use It For.
Ęthereal Haze is offline   Reply With Quote