![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
Solutions, analysis, and test data will be posted in separate threads at a later time.
Overall, a decent turnout for a first run. But I'm hoping that more will participate in the June challenge. As it turned out, Senior and Advanced were very difficult. No one scored above 50/100 on either level. People generally did much better in Beginner and Junior with 2 perfects in Beginner and 1 perfect in Junior. Winners: Beginner Level Ooble and Jessehk Junior Level Ooble Senior Level mbd Advanced Level anrchydrgn Advancements: The following people will no longer be ranked for Beginner level submissions: - Ooble - Jessehk Submission Breakdown By Language: Python 8 C++ 6 ----------- Total 14 Submission Breakdown By Division: Beginner 6 Junior 4 Senior 3 Advanced 1 ----------- Total 14 Results by Test File for Beginner: ================================================= Beginner ================================================= * - Correct Answer & - Run-Time Error T - Time Limit Exceeded X - Wrong Answer Graded in order of submission. PFO Handle | Lang | 123456789A | Total -----------------+---------+------------+------ Freaky Chris | Py | ********&T | 80 Wizard1988 | Py | *******TTT | 70 Ooble | Py | ********** | 100 opa6x57 | C++ | *X*XXXXXXX | 20 Jessehk | Py | ********** | 100 anrchydrgn | C++ | *X*X****** | 80 Results by Test File for Junior: ================================================= Junior ================================================= * - Correct Answer & - Run-Time Error T - Time Limit Exceeded X - Wrong Answer Graded in order of submission. PFO Handle | Lang | 123456789A | Total -----------------+---------+------------+------ Freaky Chris | Py | ******TTX* | 70 Ooble | Py | ********** | 100 Jessehk | Py | X********* | 90 anrchydrgn | C++ | ********X* | 90 Results by Test File for Senior: ================================================= Senior ================================================= * - Correct Answer & - Run-Time Error T - Time Limit Exceeded X - Wrong Answer Graded in order of submission. PFO Handle | Lang | 123456789ABC | Total -----------------+---------+--------------+------ mbd | C++ | **X***XXXXXX | 42 Ooble | Py | **X*&*XXXXXX | 33 anrchydrgn | C++ | **XXTXXXXXTT | 17 Results by Test File for Advanced: ================================================= Advanced ================================================= * - Correct Answer & - Run-Time Error T - Time Limit Exceeded X - Wrong Answer Graded in order of submission. PFO Handle | Lang | 12345678 | Total -----------------+---------+----------+------ anrchydrgn | C++ | *XXXXTTT | 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Oblivious One
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 644
Rep Power: 4
![]() |
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
Damn.
![]() Now I just want to know why I got the first one wrong for the junior level problem. I'm still happy with 100/100 and 90/100. I'm assuming you wrote a program to do all the evaluations/keep track of who will be evaluated for each level, etc. Mind sharing? ![]()
__________________
Dr. Zoidberg: [ecstatic] I'm going to a movie... with FRIENDS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
I was rushed for time so I had to do this all by hand.
I'll probably write something later, but it's tough with the vast differences in submissions I get. I think you were one of the only ones who followed the format perfectly. I think your solution failed because it didn't properly handle k=1, and it ended up outputting 11 instead of 10 for n=5. You'll see the test data tonight or tomorrow when I finish all of the threads. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional Programmer
|
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
run-time error o dear lol i should go back to school, or at least start a course that would be a good idea. Welldone though guys
Chirs
__________________
Steven Skiena - Algorithms ,[->+>+<<]>>[-<<+>>]>++++++++[-<++++++++>]<+[-<->]>+<<[[-]+++++++++++++++.[-]>]>>[+++++++++.[-]],brainf**k -- It's such a pretty language |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
I think it had to do with either too big of numbers in your range() or a negative range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Professional Programmer
|
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
hmm yes i guess too larger number could indeed cause that to happen. It appears to be fine for negative. Thanks for the feedback anyway
Chris
__________________
Steven Skiena - Algorithms ,[->+>+<<]>>[-<<+>>]>++++++++[-<++++++++>]<+[-<->]>+<<[[-]+++++++++++++++.[-]>]>>[+++++++++.[-]],brainf**k -- It's such a pretty language |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() |
Re: SMAC #1 [05-08] - Results
The test data and solutions for all problems are now up. Please ask if you have any questions, or if it looks like I messed up somewhere.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| smac results |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple program odd results | sixstringartist | C | 4 | Feb 4th, 2008 2:29 AM |
| Trying to pipe output system command results directly into a variable | VernonDozier | C++ | 5 | Jan 6th, 2008 2:39 AM |
| Looking for a stock results calculator.... | Uphill | Paid Job Offers | 3 | Dec 4th, 2007 12:46 AM |
| Strange behavior: getting different results from the same input on a function. WTH? | pulpfiction | C | 1 | Mar 28th, 2006 11:43 PM |