View Single Post
Old Apr 15th, 2008, 3:19 PM   #11
lectricpharaoh
Caffeinated Neural Net
 
lectricpharaoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dry west coast of Canada
Posts: 1,039
Rep Power: 5 lectricpharaoh will become famous soon enough
Re: Zero Tolerance Executable Policy

I have rarely, if ever, attached files on the forums before, and as such, was unaware that there was a filter blocking the attachment of .EXE files. When I first started reading this thread, that's what I thought mbd was advocating, but it became clear it was actually about linking to .EXEs. I support the former, as it's a) already in place, and hasn't proven to be a problem, and b) it's automated, and requires zero effort from the moderators. However, I don't support the latter, for much the same reasons Narue stated (much more succinctly than I would have), in particular the bit about malicious code in source files.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narue
Ultimately, it's overly harsh for members, too difficult to implement successfully, and really buys us nothing. A much better solution is to leave things as they are and let the community police itself.
I noticed that I'm the only one who voted 'no'. Come on!
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbd
the threads i linked in the original post in this thread do not contribute anything to the community other than malware and hacking requests. why are they still visible? this is my concern. are there not enough moderators to do the job? is there some method of alerting the moderators about useless threads that promote malware and hacking that i am unaware of?
Try the 'report this post' link under the poster's name. Every post has one.
__________________
And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper-piece harlot.
- Vaarsuvius, Order of the Stick
lectricpharaoh is offline   Reply With Quote