|
|
| View Poll Results: What is more portable? | |||
| Tables |
   
|
2 | 20.00% |
| Divs |
  
|
8 | 80.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
Dec 19th, 2007, 4:38 PM
|
#1 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 2
 |
Div vs Table Layouts - Your opinion
When it comes down to positioning, I believe tables are more portable across browsers. Using tables to layout your site (not that i do) generates a lot of extra code but now with faster connections does more code really mean much less performance? taking into consideration how the layout will require minimal browser compatibility patches and most screen readers will still read the content.
My question is why, when you realistically look at tables vs divs, is it more sensible to use tables to layout your site? After all google still uses tables to layout their site. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 100% Table Height using Firefox | hoffmandirt | ASP.NET | 2 | Jun 23rd, 2006 9:34 AM |
| mysql table view require()or suggestions. | piercy | PHP | 15 | Apr 28th, 2006 6:29 AM |
| word wrap in a table cell? | kerriganm | HTML / XHTML / CSS | 4 | May 6th, 2005 5:38 PM |
| Table in C language??? | Planet_EN | C++ | 5 | Mar 31st, 2005 10:09 AM |
| Calling a function in a table | Navid | JavaScript and Client-Side Browser Scripting | 2 | Mar 11th, 2005 11:09 AM |
Threaded Mode