![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
King of Portal
|
Re: Messing with Serialization
I refer you to the Gladius page Sane ^_^. Might interest you. I myself am too lazy to learn all the rules and regs behind database manipulation like all that Calculus and normalization and file locking and blah blah blah. Didn't need it for my purposes I figured, and I figure an integrated database would also work much quicker. Though I'm sure that previous sentence will get my head chewed off here. Well I say this, Google uses flat files, so screw you SQL hippies. lol
__________________
Lo, there do I see my father. 'Lo, there do I see My mother, and my sisters, and my brothers. 'Lo, there do I see The line of my people... Back to the beginning. 'Lo, they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them. In the halls of Valhalla... Where the brave... May live... ...forever.. GrimBB | Mimesis |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,799
Rep Power: 5
![]() |
Re: Messing with Serialization
Very cool.
Thanks for the link.And I agree about the integrated part, but you can't always say it will work faster. Usually these databases know exactly where a particular row is before you've even queried it. The same may not apply to yours. But that's all right, I'm not here to convince you to change anything. And I don't have any stats to back up the differences in performance either way. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Serialization | grimpirate | Software Design and Algorithms | 7 | Oct 31st, 2007 11:35 PM |
| how to transfer object using socket (tcp/ip) | amitpansuria | C++ | 4 | Aug 28th, 2007 5:44 AM |
| Binary Serialization vs. Byte Streams | kurifu | C# | 1 | Apr 7th, 2007 5:17 PM |