Programming Forums > Community Forums > Coder's Corner Lounge

Darkhack · Jul 3rd, 2007, 2:40 PM

If one were to create an open source program and license it under the GPL, they own the copyright on that software. However, let's say that over time the project becomes very large and I have 100+ developers who have contributed patches to it. If I decide to change to the BSD license, is it legal? I would think that may be a bit decieving to the programmers whom I've accepted patches from. They thought that their work would be under the GPL and now the main author is changing to the BSD license. Is this fair, and is it legal? Would it even be legal if I got approval from all the developers who contributed patches?

russianpirate · Jul 3rd, 2007, 3:28 PM

If you created the program, and even though they made patches, you still maintained it.. then I would say you probably could do anything with your software.

Random-Spirit · Jul 3rd, 2007, 3:50 PM

If you get permission of all the developers who contributed then yes you can change the license. If one of your contributers does not like the new license you will have to remove their code before changing licenses. Anything they have contributed will be under the GPL and they own the copyright to it, you don't. If any of the developers give up copyright to the code then you don't need their permission to change the license.

However the new license will only apply to the code from the point at which you change the license. So all old versions will still be under the previous license.

Some projects fork when some people want to change license. But still any code that is still under the old license(ie the developer who wrote it did not give permission) has to be removed and probably rewritten.

It would be impossible to change the license if you can not contact any the developers as they could reappear and cause issues. It is best to choose a license at the start and stick to it.

Eoin · Jul 3rd, 2007, 5:40 PM

Yep you can't re-licence something unless you hold the copyright or it is in the public domain. For example the guy's over at Boost.org have a blanket permission page to try and avoid such a messy situation.

Note there is a line in the GPL comments at the top of each source code file which says

Quote:

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.

That bit in bold has proved very controversial in the past and some GPL2 project do not include it!

Jul 3rd, 2007, 2:40 PM	#1
Darkhack Hobbyist Programmer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Kansas City Posts: 105 Rep Power: 3	Legality of Changing Open Source Licenses? If one were to create an open source program and license it under the GPL, they own the copyright on that software. However, let's say that over time the project becomes very large and I have 100+ developers who have contributed patches to it. If I decide to change to the BSD license, is it legal? I would think that may be a bit decieving to the programmers whom I've accepted patches from. They thought that their work would be under the GPL and now the main author is changing to the BSD license. Is this fair, and is it legal? Would it even be legal if I got approval from all the developers who contributed patches?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
To open source or not to open source, that is the question	melbolt	Coder's Corner Lounge	5	Apr 30th, 2007 3:07 PM
Choosing a License for Open Source Project	smith.norton	Project Ideas	23	Oct 7th, 2006 3:27 AM
Open Source	kp4621	Coder's Corner Lounge	51	May 19th, 2006 8:58 AM
what open source code is good to read for a beginner?	linuxpimp20	Other Programming Languages	22	Aug 30th, 2005 3:01 PM

Jul 3rd, 2007, 3:28 PM	#2
russianpirate Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 0	If you created the program, and even though they made patches, you still maintained it.. then I would say you probably could do anything with your software.

Jul 3rd, 2007, 3:50 PM	#3
Random-Spirit Unverified User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: England Posts: 22 Rep Power: 0	If you get permission of all the developers who contributed then yes you can change the license. If one of your contributers does not like the new license you will have to remove their code before changing licenses. Anything they have contributed will be under the GPL and they own the copyright to it, you don't. If any of the developers give up copyright to the code then you don't need their permission to change the license. However the new license will only apply to the code from the point at which you change the license. So all old versions will still be under the previous license. Some projects fork when some people want to change license. But still any code that is still under the old license(ie the developer who wrote it did not give permission) has to be removed and probably rewritten. It would be impossible to change the license if you can not contact any the developers as they could reappear and cause issues. It is best to choose a license at the start and stick to it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Programming Forums > Community Forums > Coder's Corner Lounge

Legality of Changing Open Source Licenses?