jaeusm: OK, perhaps I overstated my point. 1.0 -> 2.0 caused a lot of problems for people I know, and I haven't actually heard anything similar about 2.0 -> 3.0 as yet, and to be fair even 1.0 -> 2.0 did not constitute a radical change. I should have said significant or incompatible changes, and avoided suggesting that 2.0 -> 3.0 was problematic when actually I don't know that; haven't heard any scare stories so far, just a lot of developers being concerned that MS were about to do the same thing again that they'd done with the previous version shift.
Points taken, thanks for keeping me honest.
