![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Retired Programmer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
wxWidgets vs Other Toolkits
I just started using wxWidgets and I have to say, I'm rather impressed. I've programmed primarly using the native Windows API, and I have to say this is soooo much easier. I was just wandering what are the pros and cons of using wWidgets over other toolkits. I've heard MFC has a smaller executable size (A major concern for me; because the people I give my programs to have older machines). I'm wondering if there is a way to make my output size smaller (the smallest I can get it is 2.13 MB or so; thats with the "strip executable" option on) Or is there another toolkit I should try out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Programming Guru
![]() ![]() |
wxWidgets are great, i also like GTK+. Both are similar.
problem with MFC, it's not cross platform. wxWdigets and GTK+ are. if you are developing for a user base that uses both OS's, you'll have to stick with wxWdigets or GTK+ or even the Qt libs. I haven't used the Qt libs at all, so i can't really comment on them. to answer you file size question, you may want to take at this here link. it provides a few good tips on how to make your wxWidgets exe smaller.
__________________
Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand. Check out my Blog <---updated Nov 30 2007! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Getting wxWidgets to work | titaniumdecoy | C++ | 5 | Oct 15th, 2006 4:48 PM |
| Odd WxWidgets Inconsistency? | Sane | C++ | 34 | Jul 13th, 2006 9:12 AM |
| wxWidgets vs Windows API | Zap | C++ | 29 | Jul 13th, 2006 8:14 AM |
| wxWidgets Size Problem. | HackeZ | C++ | 13 | Feb 7th, 2006 9:32 PM |