Programming Forums - View Single Post

Jimbo · Dec 8th, 2006, 10:18 PM

Jessehk - Your method seems inefficient. It has a running time of O(n) compared to the O(1) solution we've already come up with.

Dec 8th, 2006, 10:18 PM	#12
Jimbo Battle Programmer Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Bellevue, WA, USA Posts: 770 Rep Power: 3	Jessehk - Your method seems inefficient. It has a running time of O(n) compared to the O(1) solution we've already come up with. __________________ <insert disclaimer here> <insert shameless plug for Visual Studio here>