![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Programming Guru
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: elemental plane
Posts: 1,429
Rep Power: 5
![]() |
DesktopBSD
DestkopBSD 1.0 has been released the day before yesterday.
DesktopBSD is a FreeBSD derivative and includes KDE 3.5.1 and a host of tools designed to make the BSD experience more palatable to novices. It has been released for both 32-bit and 64-bit x86 architectures. From the DesktopBSD review: Quote:
BSD might still beat Linux, if they get the hardware support right. I wonder how it compares to Linux on other issues. P.S. The site is slow, so you might have to be a bit patient.
__________________
"Employ your time in improving yourself by other men's writings, so that you shall gain easily what others have labored hard for." -- Socrates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional Programmer
|
I'm sure I'll give it a whirl, I wonder how it compares to PC-BSD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
Looks good. I'll give it a try.
![]()
__________________
When will Jesus bring the porkchops? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional Programmer
|
I was going to give it a try, (yes, I saw a BSD distro that actually looked cool) but saw how big it was and decided against it. :/
__________________
The world's first athletic computer geek! The home of PrProgramsStudios How not to post a question: <-- Please don't reply |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
I might consider trying this. I considered FreeBSD for quite a while although I never got around to trying it because I was worried about hardware compatibility. I can't even get some of the major Linux distrobutions to get it right. Believe or not but K/Ubuntu has actually been one of the worst. It couldn't even get video right** and during the install I got an error message simply because it found a FAT32 partition on my drive. I use it to transfer files to/from Linux and also to backup important files incase I need to reinstall windows. I was able to ignore the error and have it install fine but then I realized that K/Ubuntu doesn't even come with gcc or make. I really had a bad expierence and was expecting better from one of the top distrobutions. I am downloading Fedora Core 5 right now. Since Fedora is a very popular distrobution and its a new version, it might work alright with my system. If not then I'll try DesktopBSD.
I've always pondered about BSD development. Although Linux is very fragmented at times its nice to know that the kernel is the one thing that is common between them. With BSD it seems everyone is out writing their own kernel and thus their efforts are being repeated and you have people re-inventing the wheel over and over again.*** BSD people seem to be more intelligent than most Linux users however. I would say that a pretty good sum of people are only using Linux to be anti-Microsoft. BSD people seem more calm and cool with everything that is out there and are less radical about Microsoft than Linux users. They also seem to be more knowledgable about Unix systems as a whole.**** ** - I realize video is always very fickle under Linux but I've tried distros that were years old that atleast setup VESA correctly. K/Ubuntu is the only one I've tried thats failed to even do that! *** - I am not trying to start a flame war. I am very much interested in trying BSD. I am just contributing to the conversation things that I have heard. **** - I am not making generalizations. I realize this does not hold true for everything. This has simply been my expierence in talking to different users. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
If you can't install via DVD then I don't recommend it as the CD version is very minimal on the programs side of things. And it's just kinda small and not worth installing as a main system. But for a beginner who wants to use a *nix system like BSD then this is great, but if your experienced then go with FreeBSD.
![]()
__________________
When will Jesus bring the porkchops? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
Update of above post:
It does not come with GAIM, or X-Chat, any mozilla products. If you want to install any of those you run into major dependency errors.
__________________
When will Jesus bring the porkchops? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Unverified User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: none
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
I was thinking of trying it until I read the above post. No Firefox, WTF?
__________________
Warning: My posts may change (dramatically) within the first 15 minutes they're posted. Got 'Nux?—GNU/Linux and other free software support. It's GNU/Linux, not just Linux. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hobbyist Programmer
|
Yeah... :////////// The first distro I've ever used without a Mozilla product on it.
__________________
When will Jesus bring the porkchops? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Professional Programmer
|
Quote:
As for the people...the same people that love linux love firefox because 1) they are usually anti-MS and 2)they want to be a part of something. with linux, you have complete control over what you want to put into it, and if you don't like it, you make your own distro. However, with FreeBSD, you can't just make a patch and have it go through, there's channels, approvals, etc. For whatever reason people don't think the code should be inspected and approved before they just let the public have at it. @nebula: If you are trying to isntall firefox, gaim, etc from the ports system as root you shouldn't have any problems, since ports will automatically download all dependencies for you (unless you're downloading something like the JDK which is under Sun's licensing restrictions, in which case you have to fetch the dependencies yourself. But at least it tells you the URL and the filename you'll need and where you need to put it). Go to /usr/ports/www/firefox and just do a make install clean and you'll be good to go. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|