Programming Forums > Application Development > C++

rsnd · Jan 1st, 2007, 10:27 PM

What is right with this piece of code!

class CustomizeDialog : 
	public nContainerWindow
{
	nStatic LabelNick;
	nStatic LabelQutMessage;
	nEdit TextNick;
	nEdit TextQuitMessage;
	nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat;
	nTickBox CheckRecordAll;
	nStatic LabelRecording;
	nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo;
	nStatic LabelGameplay;
	nComboBox CmbGameMode;
	nButton ButtionDone;
	nButton ButtonAdvanced;

	class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic {
		void initialize();
	} SpecialLabel;

public:

	void on_initialize();

};

Indigno · Jan 1st, 2007, 10:45 PM

I'm assuming you mean what is wrong. And I think it's the semicolon at the very end after the parentheses. Unless I'm mistaken.

Game_Ender · Jan 1st, 2007, 11:11 PM

There is nothing wrong with that code at all. The following compiles fine with GCC 4.1 and all warnings cranked up.

 cpp Syntax (Toggle Plain Text) 
class nStatic {};
class nContainerWindow {};
class nEdit {};
class nTickBox {};
class nComboBox {};
class nButton {};
 
class CustomizeDialog : 
	public nContainerWindow
{
	nStatic LabelNick;
	nStatic LabelQutMessage;
	nEdit TextNick;
	nEdit TextQuitMessage;
	nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat;
	nTickBox CheckRecordAll;
	nStatic LabelRecording;
	nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo;
	nStatic LabelGameplay;
	nComboBox CmbGameMode;
	nButton ButtionDone;
	nButton ButtonAdvanced;
 
	class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic {
		void initialize();
	} SpecialLabel;
 
public:
 
	void on_initialize();
 
};
 
int main(void)
{
    return 0;
}
class nStatic {};
class nContainerWindow {};
class nEdit {};
class nTickBox {};
class nComboBox {};
class nButton {};

class CustomizeDialog : 
	public nContainerWindow
{
	nStatic LabelNick;
	nStatic LabelQutMessage;
	nEdit TextNick;
	nEdit TextQuitMessage;
	nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat;
	nTickBox CheckRecordAll;
	nStatic LabelRecording;
	nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo;
	nStatic LabelGameplay;
	nComboBox CmbGameMode;
	nButton ButtionDone;
	nButton ButtonAdvanced;

	class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic {
		void initialize();
	} SpecialLabel;

public:

	void on_initialize();

};

int main(void)
{
    return 0;
}

DaWei · Jan 1st, 2007, 11:32 PM

The problem is with your post, rsnd; it's shitty. Use a meaningful subject line. Show enough definitions that someone can assess your code. As you see, GameEnder made some assumptions, added some definitions, and got the code to compile. Give the content of your error messages. Indicate what line or statement triggered them.

At 117 posts, and having read the rules and a "How to Post a Question" thread (you have done that, right?), this just shows an infantile approach. This is not ProgrammingKindergarten.org.

rsnd · Jan 1st, 2007, 11:46 PM

DaWei is still mean to me =(

Dont you at least think that there is something wrong there with classes inside classes and function declarations =( I must be getting old

DaWei · Jan 1st, 2007, 11:49 PM

Hell, I don't cater to kids acting stupid, much less adults. If that's mean, go whine to mama.

If you meant to ask if classes can be nested, why didn't you just ask (or try a simple example out in your compiler).

Even if you've read the rules, I recommend you go to them again and click on that "Smart questions" link.

bl00dninja · Jan 2nd, 2007, 12:41 AM

yeah, you can nest classes...you can do all types of weird shit.

Jimbo · Jan 2nd, 2007, 7:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsnd

Dont you at least think that there is something wrong there with classes inside classes and function declarations =( I must be getting old

What is wrong with this? Scoping rules still apply, so it's just another facet to organizing your code structure.

Ravalon · Jan 2nd, 2007, 9:49 AM

Quote:

Dont you at least think that there is something wrong there with classes inside classes and function declarations =(

Why would there be? Nested classes make perfect sense because that is a valid organizational technique when the nested class is dependent on the enclosing class or function, or the scope of the nested class needs to be restricted to only the enclosing class or function.

Jan 1st, 2007, 10:27 PM	#1
rsnd Hobbyist Programmer Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Helltown Posts: 162 Rep Power: 4	Omg! What is right with this piece of code! (Toggle Plain Text) class CustomizeDialog : public nContainerWindow { nStatic LabelNick; nStatic LabelQutMessage; nEdit TextNick; nEdit TextQuitMessage; nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat; nTickBox CheckRecordAll; nStatic LabelRecording; nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo; nStatic LabelGameplay; nComboBox CmbGameMode; nButton ButtionDone; nButton ButtonAdvanced; class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic { void initialize(); } SpecialLabel; public: void on_initialize(); }; class CustomizeDialog : public nContainerWindow { nStatic LabelNick; nStatic LabelQutMessage; nEdit TextNick; nEdit TextQuitMessage; nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat; nTickBox CheckRecordAll; nStatic LabelRecording; nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo; nStatic LabelGameplay; nComboBox CmbGameMode; nButton ButtionDone; nButton ButtonAdvanced; class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic { void initialize(); } SpecialLabel; public: void on_initialize(); }; __________________ Spread your wings and fly! Chicken!

Jan 1st, 2007, 10:45 PM	#2
Indigno Professional Programmer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Anywhere non-productive Posts: 267 Rep Power: 0	I'm assuming you mean what is wrong. And I think it's the semicolon at the very end after the parentheses. Unless I'm mistaken. __________________ Perhaps I should have a sticky topic for all of the times I "return" to this forum instead of a new one every time.

Jan 1st, 2007, 11:11 PM	#3
Game_Ender Professional Programmer Join Date: May 2006 Location: Maryland, USA Posts: 306 Rep Power: 3	There is nothing wrong with that code at all. The following compiles fine with GCC 4.1 and all warnings cranked up. cpp Syntax (Toggle Plain Text) class nStatic {}; class nContainerWindow {}; class nEdit {}; class nTickBox {}; class nComboBox {}; class nButton {}; class CustomizeDialog : public nContainerWindow { nStatic LabelNick; nStatic LabelQutMessage; nEdit TextNick; nEdit TextQuitMessage; nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat; nTickBox CheckRecordAll; nStatic LabelRecording; nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo; nStatic LabelGameplay; nComboBox CmbGameMode; nButton ButtionDone; nButton ButtonAdvanced; class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic { void initialize(); } SpecialLabel; public: void on_initialize(); }; int main(void) { return 0; } class nStatic {}; class nContainerWindow {}; class nEdit {}; class nTickBox {}; class nComboBox {}; class nButton {}; class CustomizeDialog : public nContainerWindow { nStatic LabelNick; nStatic LabelQutMessage; nEdit TextNick; nEdit TextQuitMessage; nTickBox CheckRecordNoIncChat; nTickBox CheckRecordAll; nStatic LabelRecording; nTickBox CheckRecNoIncUserInfo; nStatic LabelGameplay; nComboBox CmbGameMode; nButton ButtionDone; nButton ButtonAdvanced; class SW_SpecialLabel : public nStatic { void initialize(); } SpecialLabel; public: void on_initialize(); }; int main(void) { return 0; }

Jan 1st, 2007, 11:32 PM	#4
DaWei Resident Grouch Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 6,453 Rep Power: 10	The problem is with your post, rsnd; it's shitty. Use a meaningful subject line. Show enough definitions that someone can assess your code. As you see, GameEnder made some assumptions, added some definitions, and got the code to compile. Give the content of your error messages. Indicate what line or statement triggered them. At 117 posts, and having read the rules and a "How to Post a Question" thread (you have done that, right?), this just shows an infantile approach. This is not ProgrammingKindergarten.org. __________________ Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers

Jan 1st, 2007, 11:46 PM	#5
rsnd Hobbyist Programmer Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Helltown Posts: 162 Rep Power: 4	DaWei is still mean to me =( Dont you at least think that there is something wrong there with classes inside classes and function declarations =( I must be getting old __________________ Spread your wings and fly! Chicken!

Jan 1st, 2007, 11:49 PM	#6
DaWei Resident Grouch Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 6,453 Rep Power: 10	Hell, I don't cater to kids acting stupid, much less adults. If that's mean, go whine to mama. If you meant to ask if classes can be nested, why didn't you just ask (or try a simple example out in your compiler). Even if you've read the rules, I recommend you go to them again and click on that "Smart questions" link. __________________ Abstraction doesn't make it impossible to write bad code; it makes it possible to write superior code. Contributor's Corner: Grumpy on C++ Exceptions DaWei on Pointers

Jan 2nd, 2007, 12:41 AM	#7
bl00dninja Programming Guru Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: namespace std Posts: 1,246 Rep Power: 6	yeah, you can nest classes...you can do all types of weird shit. __________________ i put on my robe and wizard hat... Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?...Morons.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Programming Forums > Application Development > C++

Omg!